Showing posts with label olympics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label olympics. Show all posts

Friday, 7 February 2014

WINTER OLYMPICS - essential facts!

WINTER OLYMPICS - essential facts! 

Armchair sports fans like facts, they need facts, they desire facts.... this book provides the reader with the essential facts about the history of the Winter Olympics so you can appear knowledgable before, during and after the 16 days of competition. 



 #WinterOlympics #Olympics #Trivia #Kindle
 

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B00HR6O8EY?ie=UTF8&camp=3194&creative=21330&creativeASIN=B00HR6O8EY&linkCode=shr&tag=robertsteadmc-21

Sunday, 19 January 2014

WINTER OLYMPICS (Steadman's Armchair Miscellany)

WINTER OLYMPICS (Steadman's Armchair Miscellany) - trivia for armchair sports fans



Armchair sports fans like facts, they need facts, they desire facts.... this book provides the reader with the essential facts about the history of the Winter Olympics so you can appear knowledgable before, during and after the 16 days of competition. 




#kindle #winterolympics #trivia

Friday, 6 July 2012

Bolt - a fanfare for orchestra

A fanfare for orchestra inspired by the celebrations of the Oympics and, more specifically, the sprinter Usain Bolt!




If you're interested in performing the piece, the score and parts can be downloaded from: http://www.scoreexchange.com/scores/126303.html

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
www.robertsteadman.com
Score Exchange

Friday, 29 June 2012

Wednesday, 13 June 2012

It's time to remove nationality from the Olympics

The case of Aaron Cook is just bizarre. Cook is the World No. 1 at under 80kg Taekwondo and yet he hasn't been selected by the British Taekwondo selectors to represent Great Britain at next month's Olympics. He says one thing, they say another and it's made all the more complicated by the fact there seem to be about 10 organisations who each claim to be the national body for Taekwondo.



To me it makes no sense that competitors are chosen by national bodies. The Olympics should be about the best and having no-hopers from nations that, similarly, have no hope in some events belittles the events. Remember Edfie the Eagle? And Eric the Eel? Amusing maybe but do they reflect the Olympic ideal? How do such no-hopers live up to the Olympic motto: Citius, Altius, Fortius - Faster, Higher, Stronger NOT funnier, excruciating and more embarrassing.

Surely selection for events should be simple - the world's top 100 (or however many they need for a specific event) regardless of nationality. Sure, that might mean that some events are dominated by a couple of nationalities. So what? If the starting line up for the marathon had 50 Kenyans, 50 Ethiopians and no osu else what would it matter if those 100 were the best 100 marathon runners in the world? If the starters in the 100m were all either Jamaican and American what would it matter? Don't we want all the best athletes competing against each other?



And, any way, in individual sports (and even in pairs, fours and eights) why should nationality have any relevance? I know the morons who get jingoistic about such matters get all emotional about "winning gold for Britain" but why? They are winning for themselves, not for anything else. They are winning so that they can get their sponsorship deals and appearance fees over the next few years.

Even in team sports it would surely be better to have teams that regularly played together instead of teams brought together for two weeks every four years? Why not have the Olympuc football tournament competed by teams like Barcelona and Manchester United instead of the nonsense we're about to see Stuart Pearce oversee? How about the basketball and ice hockey being between the best teams not just teams thrust together by accident of birth (or grandparents' births)?

Nationalism is such a crock of nonsense. A random geographical position of a woman giving birth within artificial and random borders. Why does anyone feel pride in a nation? It's just bollocks.

I fear the forthcoming Olympics will be, as the recent idiotic Jubilee was, a chance for the right wing press to fuel xenophobia and encourage the proles to continue supporting anachronistic systems and a 19th century world view.

Nationalism has no place in the modern world. It is the fuel for hate. The Olympics needs to be above such nonsense. It is time to drop national committees. It is the for a new internationalist approach to the world and I see no reason why that can't start with sport.

Sunday, 27 May 2012

Be not afeard, the isle is full of noises (a piano sonata)

Here's a new piano sonata "what I wrote"!

The title comes from Shakespeare's "The Tempest" and will also be the inscription on the bell at the opening ceremony of the London 2012 Olympic Games.



The sheet music is available from: http://www.scoreexchange.com/scores/126960.html

Friday, 11 May 2012

Olympic Orbit Tower

Anish Kapoor's ArcelorMittal Orbit, which has just be completed in the Olympic Park, will be the UK's tallest structure.

Here's a short film about it.

Saturday, 5 May 2012

"One vision" - Team GB's official Olympic & Paralympic song

It was, of course, somehow inevitable that there would be an "official" Team GB for the forthcoming Olympics and Paralympics. There's a long tradition of good and bad sporting songs that have been produced over the years but this is just awful.



Alfie Boe (of "Les Mis") fame and Kimberley Walsh (a sometime member of Girls Aloud) have recorded a version of the Queen classic, One Vision.

It's a great song and it is a classic, but this cover version is simply appalling.

They've tweaked a few words to fit the purpose so "one man" becomes "one team", etc. Not in itself a hanging offence, but it all goes wrong when Alfie Boe opens his mouth.

Mr. Boe's faux-operatic vocal performance just sounds idiotic on this rock song, with it's short phrases and earthiness. It's like when Pavarotti recorded Miserere with Zucchero - the palid Italian pop singer sounded better. Here it is Kimberley Walsh who benefits from the pomposity of Boe's performance which makes Freddie Mercury sound shy.

I also struggle to understand why they're recycling songs from 30 years ago instead of celebrating the current crop of British songwriters by having a new, specially written song.

My final gripe isn't about the song but about "Team GB" - a cringeworthy epithet that manages to ignore the fact that it a UK team that includes Northern Ireland as well as the three Great British nations.

Awful, awful, awful.

Let's hope the opening and closing ceremonies are better than this rubbish.

Sunday, 29 April 2012

COMMENT: Dwain Chambers should not be selected for the Olympics

Tomorrow's pre-announced decision from the Court of Arbitration for Sport is fundamentally flawed. Cheats like Dwain Chambers and David Millar should never be selected to represent their country again.


While we have national selection, it should be up to each nation to set its own criteria but, surely, when someone has been proven to blatantly cheat for financial gain, has wrecked other competitors careers and hasn't named names they should never be allowed to compete again, let alone be selected to represent a nation at high profile, and, ultimately, profitable events like the Olympics.

Let's be honest, if Dwain Chambers wins the 100m gold will anyone be pleased? Will anyone, even the most patriotic, feel it is good for the country? And will I be the only one wondering whether he is genuinely clean?

The likes of Chambers and Millar, and Ben Johnson, and Linford Christie, and Chrustine for that matter, knew what the rules were. They chose to break them. They shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a spots stadium ever again, and they certainly shoukdnt be allows anywhere near young athletes.

The British Olympic Assiciation's stance is good and should be lauded. Their upholding of anti drug cheat laws should be the gold standard to which all nations should aspire. The BOA shouldn't be forced to lower their standards to those of other countries.

Cheats are cheats. They made a choice. The CAS decision is a travesty of justice.

Wednesday, 18 April 2012

100 Days to the London Olympics

Today marks 100 days until the opening ceremony of the 2012 Olympic Games in London.


To me, the Olympics are a tremendous event, something which is inspirational, something which will be remembered for a lifetime, and something which will have a physical and emotional legacy on future generations.

Yes, I accept there are issues about the Olympics.

Some point to the cost of staging the games, whilst ignoring the increased tourism they will bring.

Some point to the potential for terrorism, or to what they consider to be OTT restrictions on civil rights during the Games - but i'd rather the Games went off without incident with everyone safe.

Some point to the corporate sponsors and say that a few of the companies giving money to the Games have questionable backgrounds and records - and I, for one, have some sympathy for their view. I wish it wasn't necessary to have any corporate sponsorship at all. I wish that fast food and confectionary companies couldn't link their names with sports events. I wish that companies with bad human rights records couldn't try to make themselves look good by linking to the Games. It is an unfortunate by-product of the economic system the West has chosen.

Some point to the transportation delays possible during the Games but ignore that there's been plenty of warning and it's up to individuals to make sensible arrangements. Remember, it is only for a couple of weeks.

Some dismiss the sportsmen and women as over paid prima donnas and mostly drug cheats. Yes, that may be the case for a few, and the Okympucs need to look seriously at whether drugs cheats are ever allowed to compete again, but the vast majority are examples of humanity excelling in sporting endeavours.

Some, including me, are hoping the Olympics doesn't become a tasteless orgy if nationalistic jingoism - but fear that our tabloid press will fuel such unpleasant fervour.

But, even if all of those things were true, even if all of them were as bad as they could get, I think the Olympic Games is a fantastic event and one which the UK, an historically important sporting nation, should be looking forward to hosting.

Tuesday, 10 April 2012

OPINION: Bronze is for losers

In a magazine interview, British long distance runner Paula Radcliffe has said that she'd be "happy" if she won a bronze medal at this summer's Olympic Games in London.


Really? Happy with a bronze?

To me, that's an appalling attitude for any sportsperson to have. Nobody should EVER be "happy" with a bronze. Bronze is for losers.

Ok, Paula Radcliffe, despite having won a number of gold medals during her career, and having broken various world records, has always managed to balls-up her push for medals when it comes to the Olympics. In both Athens and Beijing she failed to get close to winning a medal, gaining herself a bit of a reputation as a choker. With medals won at World and European championships, Commonwealth Games, and, of course, various stand alone marathons in many of the world's great cities, the noticeable gap is for any sort of Olympic gong, and so, perhaps, on those grounds, an athlete who is almost certainly now past her best might just be happy with a bronze but, really, what sort of attitude is that to have when going into the greatest sporting arena in the world?

If you're not aiming for gold, why bother?

If you don't believe you can win gold, why bother?

Bronze, and for that matter silver, medals are for losers. They shouldn't be celebrated. Those who get silver and bronze may well have come close to winning gold, but they didn't win gold - that's the point, they lost. They are losers.

I think that, because of her negative and defeatist attitude which may rub off on others, Paula Radcliffe should be dropped from the British Olympic team for this summer's games. Taking part isn't good enough, and, let's be honest, a bronze is little more than taking part.

Saturday, 3 December 2011

OPINION: Merging the Olympics and Paralympics

SCOPE, the charity for people with Cerebral Palsy, has called for the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games to be merged. The logic is that it will improve the status of the disabled in society as awhile, improve the way that disabled sport is viewed, and stop people looking down on the Paralympics as they may currently do.


All well and good, maybe.

The problem comes in the practicalities of merging these two quite separate events.

In reality, the media coverage would still, in all likelihood, focus on the able-bodied sportsmen and women who will be running faster, jumping higher and setting records that the vast majority of paralympians can never ever dream of achieving.

Oskar Pistorias, the "Blade Runner", is actually being allowed to compete in the Olympics against able-bodied athletes - maybe that's a way ahead? Or will the advantages/disadvantages of special equipment simply nullify the sports?

The next problem comes with how to merge the events - the Paralympics has man more events than the Olympics because it has different "classes" for each slight variation in disability. This means that, if all events are maintained, a joint Olympic/Paralympic medal table would be heavily weighted in favour of the countries with more disabled athletes competing. So the disabled community, a small minority of society, would occupy the majority of medals - that is, surely, a nonsense?

It would, of course, be totally unacceptable to everyone for a Paralympic Gold to only be worth, say, a tenth of an Olympic gold, so that problem is insurmountable.

The next problem comes with the staging of the combined games - having all the facilities available at the same time for both events and the time to do it. The combined Games would, I suspect, end up running to a month or more - unless a swathe of events were scrapped - and I thought the point of this was inclusion and acceptance?

I guess SCOPE are generating publicity for their cause by linking themselves to the Olympic Games but there suggestion, perfectly good on the surface, doesn't hold up to close scrutiny and, in fact, might end up doing disabled athletes a dis-service in the long run.

Tuesday, 22 November 2011

OLYMPICS: Volunteers' uniforms unveiled

I'm still eagerly awaiting my letter or email to say whether I have been selected to be a Games Maker at next Summer's Olympic Games.

I got through the first stage and was then interviewed early one Sunday morning at Warwick University. I should, apparently, hear the decision by the end of November (if all is on schedule).

In the meantime, the uniform I'll get to wear, if selected, has been unveiled:

Monday, 7 November 2011

OLYMPICS: Torch relay route unveiled

Today, details of where the 2012 Olympic Torch will go on its way to the opening ceremony of the London Olympics has been announced.

Click here for an interactive map of where and when the Torch might be near you.


The torch will travel around 8,000 miles and be carried by 8,000 torchbearers between 19th May and 27th July. Its journey will end with a trip down the River Thames to the Olympic Park.

During its journey it will travel to all parts of the UK including visits to major historic landmarks including Stonehenge, the Giant's Causeway, Edinburgh Castle and Mount Snowdon as well as being carried by canoe, balloon and even a zip wire!

LOCOG, organisers of the London games, claim the torch will pass within 10 miles of 95% of the population.

The Olympic Torch wasn't part of the Olympics when they began in 1896 but was added at the 1936 Berlin Games.



Since then, the Olympic Torch has been the centre piece of the opening ceremony,  with much speculation as to who will light the Olympic flame in the stadium (I'd bet on it being Steve Redgrave next summer!).

The Olympic Torch has had it's fair share of controversy most notably, perhaps, in 2008 when there were various attempts to put out the Olympic Flame as a protest against China's human rights record and, in particular, it's occupation of Tibet. During the London leg of the torch relay, security guards formed a "ring of steel" around the Flame to protect it, but one protester still managed to grab the torch while it was being carried by Konnie Huq.


 
The 2012 relay isn't going all round the world, as in previous relays.

Monday, 24 October 2011

OPINION: Are we heading for a UK revolution?

As Bob Dylan sang: The times they are a'changing!

 Most democracies evolve, often very slowly, over hundreds of years. In the UK there are signs that the need and desire for change is accelerating.

1. Earlier this year, we had a referendum about a new voting system (it failed but it was only the second referendum in the history of the UK).

2. Today, MPs will debate calls for another referendum, this time about membership of the EU, brought about because 100,000 people signed an e-petition.

3. For 10 days protestors have been camped outside St. Paul's Cathedral in the City of London making their voice heard on issues including corporate greed, banking dishonesty and societal inequalities.



These are just three examples of the political balance being edged slightly away from its historical roots.

There's always been protests and marches but the past decade has seen a million or more on the streets of London to oppose the war in Iraq - it could be argued that, ultimately, this lead to Tony Blair's downfall. Other huge marches have happened about issues such as fox hunting.

And then there were the riots of summer 2011; a 5-day orgy of anarchy in some areas, the police ineffectual against seemingly organised gangs whose behaviour "inspired" a swathe of lawlessness.

Is this all just a blip - the proles rattling the cage of those who truly rule - or is this something more significant?

In the UK we were the first major nation to have a revolution. More than a century before the French or Americans ditched their monarchy we had the English Civil War and over a decade as a republic. Sadly, it was a false dawn and we had the Restoration which returned everything to its previous status and with bells on!



This isn't just an anti-monarchy rant. They are just the figurehead that highlights the inequalities in society. There is a wider "elite" that keeps power and privilege in their grubby hands whilst keeping the rest of us very much in our place.

It's nearly 100 years since the Russians got rid of the Czars but it would be wrong to suggest their troubled century has given everyone their fair share.

The UK government (and opposition) makes great efforts to highlight our great "democracy" - but it's a token democracy with whip-controlled MPs doing exactly what their pay-masters tell them (most of the time!).

Next year will see both the Olympic Games come to London and the Diamond Jubilee of Queen Elizabeth II. The government will be keen to make the Olympics the "people's games" but
they will have a bigger problem celebrating Liz Windsor's jubilee while there are families struggling to put food on their kids' plates and keep their houses warm.

Maybe #OccupyLSX should have an annexe set up outside Buck House, or any of the other castles and homes we, as a nation, loan to our monarch for free?

Maybe we need marches in every city around the country demanding a new Britain with a new constitution, a new bill of rights and an end to the corruption and privilege that has been the roadblock preventing the UK from being a truly civilised and democratic nation.

The problem is the majority of the population are too apathetic - or is that just plain pathetic.

The time has come for a new start. 2012 could be that be start - the tipping point when the UK actually becomes a democracy.

Let's stop cow-towing to the Windsors and their cronies.

Let's stop putting up with a parliamentary democracy that isn't very democratic.

Let's stop accepting the inequalities in society and give everyone the equality of opportunbity they deserve and should be their right at birth.

We need a new beginning - a nation of rights AND responsibilities, where anyone COULD be Head of State, where everyone can earn a good living for themselves and their family and where nobody goes cold or hungry.

Let's stop letting those in power manipulate the rest of us for their benefit and let's take control.

Vive la Revolution!