Yes, it's that time of year again when Europe puts the clocks forward by one hour.
It gives an extra hour of daylight in the evening but, of course, makes the morning darker for an hour. The loss, for many, of an hour's sleep and the disruption to our established sleep patterns means that the next few days tend to see an increase in tiredness and more accidents.
Changing the clocks forward in spring and back in autumn might have had a purpose in the past (even that is questionable) and, of course, during World War Two there was Double Summer Time when the clocks were moved forward two hours!
Today it all seems a bit daft and unnecessarily disruptive.
Common sense, the markets and a general sense of co-operation would suggest the UK should ditch GMT and keep clocks one hour forward, joining with the rest of Western Europe.
But it's the biannual changing that's the real problem.
Let's work out which is the best time zone for the whole year and leave the clocks alone.
Showing posts with label Europe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Europe. Show all posts
Saturday, 24 March 2012
Friday, 9 December 2011
OPINION: Cameron and Hague's "Them and Us" politics is bad for everyone
The emergency talks about new treaties and potential re-organisation of Europe has really highlighted the "Them and Us" politics of David Cameron, William Hague and the rest of their Little Englander Tories.
At the time of the 2010 General Election and all the "I agree with Nick" nonsense, there was talk of, and hope for, a new politics. A politics of consensus, co-operation, of mutual benefit and of a brighter and better future for all.
Yes, I accept that was all election claptrap and, along with various other "promises" that all the parties made which they had no intention of fulfilling. I very much doubt that Cameron had any idea that having "agreed with Nick" he'd end up sharing a cabinet table with Clegg and a bunch of his Lib Dem mates (certainly not while Clegg was still a Lib Dem anyhow!).
But Cameron and Hague, and just about every British Member of Parliament in the history of Westminster, are all masters of "Them and Us" politics - it's what they do best: Divide and rule. Whether it's rich against poor, town against country, pro-nuclear against anti-nuclear, left against right, our politicians have always exaggerated difference of opinion to divide society instead of using a difference of opinion, sharing common ground and developing a consensus that is to everyone's mutual benefit.
Such "gang politics" are why our current system doesn't work properly. We elect our MPs, more often than not, by the colour of their rosette and not by their intellect, abilities or experience. In the UK we have, to all intents and purposes, a kakistocracy; agivernment of the least well qualified, because they are passionate about their gang and will always work to benefit that gang, and, therefore, disadvantage those not in the gang.
Over the past few days, it has become apparent that Cameron and Hague are now exporting their "Them and Us" politics to Europe on a stronger, more petulant way than ever before.
Yes, of course the Tories have always had a "Them and Us" approach to Europe, and it's served them well, dragging along with it large numbers of vile racists and xenophobes. Thatcher, whilst signing the Maastricht Treaty that welcomed greater European integration, continued to play the rabid bulldog for the domestic market because she knew that, not far below the surface of so many of our poorly educated masses, lies a rampant racist - someone who sees the term "Churchillian" as a positive rather than a description of a tragic and dangerous buffoon.
The issue of Europe could well tear the Tories apart again, much in the way it destroyed John Major's premiership in the early 1990s, but, today, the main beneficiaries wouldn't be Labour, or even theLib Dems. The danger is that likes of the far right would gain strongholds at Westminster and as the nation's representatives at the European Parliament. Can any person with a fully-functioning brain really want the racists and xenophobes of the BNP, UKIP and the EDL representing the UK in Europe? Do they really want the UK internationally isolated in the way heir diatribe suggests? They seem to forget that the world has changed, Britain no longer has an empire and people are no longer judged by the colour of their skin.
So, what do Cameron and Hague hope to achieve by ripping apart Europe? A few extra votes at home, maybe? Stop a few of their supporters drifting to UKIP and the BNP? Maybe even prevent some of their backbench MPs switching to other parties? Or simply some back-slapping congratulations from right-wing extremists?
The UK needs to look carefully at how well served they are by the "Them and Us" society. Do we really want to be divided so clumsily? Is it because we hope that we'll be in the lucky "Us" group? Is it simply down to greed, selfishness and racism?
Sadly, I think it is; too many Britons vote for themselves personally and don't look at the bigger picture that might, and probably would, benefit not only everyone more but, consequently, them too.
"Them and Us" politics is no different from West Side Story's Jets and Sharks. In the end, no one benefits and there are tragic casualties on the journey.
In reality, there is no "Them and Us" - there's only "Us". We need to work for the common good. We are the human race and we need to cooperate to achieve goals of mutual benefit.
It's time for a change.
At the time of the 2010 General Election and all the "I agree with Nick" nonsense, there was talk of, and hope for, a new politics. A politics of consensus, co-operation, of mutual benefit and of a brighter and better future for all.
Yes, I accept that was all election claptrap and, along with various other "promises" that all the parties made which they had no intention of fulfilling. I very much doubt that Cameron had any idea that having "agreed with Nick" he'd end up sharing a cabinet table with Clegg and a bunch of his Lib Dem mates (certainly not while Clegg was still a Lib Dem anyhow!).
But Cameron and Hague, and just about every British Member of Parliament in the history of Westminster, are all masters of "Them and Us" politics - it's what they do best: Divide and rule. Whether it's rich against poor, town against country, pro-nuclear against anti-nuclear, left against right, our politicians have always exaggerated difference of opinion to divide society instead of using a difference of opinion, sharing common ground and developing a consensus that is to everyone's mutual benefit.
Such "gang politics" are why our current system doesn't work properly. We elect our MPs, more often than not, by the colour of their rosette and not by their intellect, abilities or experience. In the UK we have, to all intents and purposes, a kakistocracy; agivernment of the least well qualified, because they are passionate about their gang and will always work to benefit that gang, and, therefore, disadvantage those not in the gang.
Over the past few days, it has become apparent that Cameron and Hague are now exporting their "Them and Us" politics to Europe on a stronger, more petulant way than ever before.
Yes, of course the Tories have always had a "Them and Us" approach to Europe, and it's served them well, dragging along with it large numbers of vile racists and xenophobes. Thatcher, whilst signing the Maastricht Treaty that welcomed greater European integration, continued to play the rabid bulldog for the domestic market because she knew that, not far below the surface of so many of our poorly educated masses, lies a rampant racist - someone who sees the term "Churchillian" as a positive rather than a description of a tragic and dangerous buffoon.
The issue of Europe could well tear the Tories apart again, much in the way it destroyed John Major's premiership in the early 1990s, but, today, the main beneficiaries wouldn't be Labour, or even theLib Dems. The danger is that likes of the far right would gain strongholds at Westminster and as the nation's representatives at the European Parliament. Can any person with a fully-functioning brain really want the racists and xenophobes of the BNP, UKIP and the EDL representing the UK in Europe? Do they really want the UK internationally isolated in the way heir diatribe suggests? They seem to forget that the world has changed, Britain no longer has an empire and people are no longer judged by the colour of their skin.
So, what do Cameron and Hague hope to achieve by ripping apart Europe? A few extra votes at home, maybe? Stop a few of their supporters drifting to UKIP and the BNP? Maybe even prevent some of their backbench MPs switching to other parties? Or simply some back-slapping congratulations from right-wing extremists?
The UK needs to look carefully at how well served they are by the "Them and Us" society. Do we really want to be divided so clumsily? Is it because we hope that we'll be in the lucky "Us" group? Is it simply down to greed, selfishness and racism?
Sadly, I think it is; too many Britons vote for themselves personally and don't look at the bigger picture that might, and probably would, benefit not only everyone more but, consequently, them too.
"Them and Us" politics is no different from West Side Story's Jets and Sharks. In the end, no one benefits and there are tragic casualties on the journey.
In reality, there is no "Them and Us" - there's only "Us". We need to work for the common good. We are the human race and we need to cooperate to achieve goals of mutual benefit.
It's time for a change.
Labels:
BNP,
Cameron,
divide and rule,
EDL,
Europe,
European Union,
Eurozone,
gang politics,
Hague,
I Agree with Nick,
Labour,
lib Dems,
Them and Us,
Tories,
UKIP,
west side story
Friday, 2 December 2011
Everything you need to know about the Katla volcano in Iceland
The Katla volcano? That's not the one that spewed forth ash clouds last year and caused air traffic chaos across Europe is it? Nope. This one is much bigger and, if seismologists are correct, looks like to burst forth soon. Things could be much worse this time!
*Katla is derived from the word Ketill meaning "kettle".
*Katla is one of the largest volcanoes in Iceland.
*Its peak reaches 1,512 metres (4,961 ft) above sea level
*It is partially covered by the 595 km² (230 sq mi) Mýrdalsjökull glacier.
*The caldera of the volcano is 10 km (6 miles) across, and covered with 200–700 metres (660-2,300 ft) of ice.
*The volcano normally erupts every 40–80 years.
*The flood discharge at the peak of an eruption in 1755 was comparable to the combined average discharge of the Amazon, Mississippi, Nile, and Yangtze rivers.
*Last major eruption began on October 12th 1918 and lasted 24 days. This is one of the longest periods of repose between major eruptions.
*The 1918 eruption registered 5 on the VEI scale (0-8).
*Small eruptions in 1955 and 1999 didn't break through the ice coverage.
*Other major eruptions occurred in: 1860, 1823, 1755, 1721, 1660, 1625, 1612, 1580 and 934.
*The eruption of 934 released 5 cubic km of tephra and 18 cubic km of lava and was one of the largest lava eruptions in the past 10,000 years.
*Signs of unrest since 1999 and increased earthquake activity in recent months.
*After the Eyjafjallajökull eruptions of 2010, Ólafur Grímsson, President of Iceland, said "the time for Katla to erupt is coming close ... we have prepared ... it is high time for European governments and airline authorities all over Europe and the world to start planning for the eventual Katla eruption".
*Katla is derived from the word Ketill meaning "kettle".
*Katla is one of the largest volcanoes in Iceland.
*Its peak reaches 1,512 metres (4,961 ft) above sea level
*It is partially covered by the 595 km² (230 sq mi) Mýrdalsjökull glacier.
*The caldera of the volcano is 10 km (6 miles) across, and covered with 200–700 metres (660-2,300 ft) of ice.
*The volcano normally erupts every 40–80 years.
*The flood discharge at the peak of an eruption in 1755 was comparable to the combined average discharge of the Amazon, Mississippi, Nile, and Yangtze rivers.
*Last major eruption began on October 12th 1918 and lasted 24 days. This is one of the longest periods of repose between major eruptions.
*The 1918 eruption registered 5 on the VEI scale (0-8).
*Small eruptions in 1955 and 1999 didn't break through the ice coverage.
*Other major eruptions occurred in: 1860, 1823, 1755, 1721, 1660, 1625, 1612, 1580 and 934.
*The eruption of 934 released 5 cubic km of tephra and 18 cubic km of lava and was one of the largest lava eruptions in the past 10,000 years.
*Signs of unrest since 1999 and increased earthquake activity in recent months.
*After the Eyjafjallajökull eruptions of 2010, Ólafur Grímsson, President of Iceland, said "the time for Katla to erupt is coming close ... we have prepared ... it is high time for European governments and airline authorities all over Europe and the world to start planning for the eventual Katla eruption".
Labels:
airline disruption,
ash,
ash cloud,
caldera,
disruption,
erupt,
eruption,
Europe,
Katla,
larva,
larva flow,
lava,
seismologist,
seismology,
VEI,
volcano
Monday, 21 November 2011
COMMENT: Nigel Farage.... why?
It is embarasing to think that Nigel Farage, the leader of UKIP (a deeply xenophobic and racist political party at the extremes of British politics who have been weedling their way into the mainstream by trying to represent themselves as moderate and the "voice of the people") represents any part of the UK but, sadly, he does.
Here is his latest tirade in the European Parliament where, despite being anti-European, he's happy to claim every Euro possible to fill his pockets.
Ignorant, xenophobic and, let's be honest, rather thick - is this the image Britons want their country to be potrayed as?
Here is his latest tirade in the European Parliament where, despite being anti-European, he's happy to claim every Euro possible to fill his pockets.
Ignorant, xenophobic and, let's be honest, rather thick - is this the image Britons want their country to be potrayed as?
Labels:
Europe,
farage,
nigel farage,
racist,
UKIP,
xenophobic
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)